. said:

Paul has more delegates than Santorum what are you talkin bout?

. said:

Remember when trolls were funny and intelligent?

Nazi butthurt

. said:

Nazi butthurt

You're an insult to trollers everywhere. Go back to CI. TIA

. said:

Paul has more delegates than Santorum what are you talkin bout?

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates

Six is more than fifteen!
\

. said:

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates

Six is more than fifteen!
\

. said:

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates

Six is more than fifteen!
\

That shows he got no delegates for IOWA when it was pretty much a 3 way tie.



http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/scorecard/statebystate/r

. said:

http://www.infowars.com/did-ron-paul-lose-iowa-delegates/


Some really dirty sh-t going on. The AIPAC jews are desperate, and desperate men do desperate deeds.

Keep whining Herman. In 3-4 months nobody will remember. Heck, in 3-4 weeks nobody will remember.

. said:

"Paul's delegate count was reported on January 11 as three. On January 19, however, the Republican establishment recalculated the Iowa caucus vote count and said that Paul had not gained a single delegate - in essence stripping him. It counted the initial vote in secret."

What in the holy f-ck? Why is there no media coverage of this?

Look over there...

. said:

"Paul's delegate count was reported on January 11 as three. On January 19, however, the Republican establishment recalculated the Iowa caucus vote count and said that Paul had not gained a single delegate - in essence stripping him. It counted the initial vote in secret."

What in the holy f-ck? Why is there no media coverage of this?

GNNNArrrrrgghhhh ungh! Hennnggghh.
\

. said:

"Paul's delegate count was reported on January 11 as three. On January 19, however, the Republican establishment recalculated the Iowa caucus vote count and said that Paul had not gained a single delegate - in essence stripping him. It counted the initial vote in secret."

What in the holy f-ck? Why is there no media coverage of this?

. said:

"Paul's delegate count was reported on January 11 as three. On January 19, however, the Republican establishment recalculated the Iowa caucus vote count and said that Paul had not gained a single delegate - in essence stripping him. It counted the initial vote in secret."

What in the holy f-ck? Why is there no media coverage of this?

Correction, in 3-4 DAYS nobody will remember.

. said:

Keep whining Herman. In 3-4 months nobody will remember. Heck, in 3-4 weeks nobody will remember.

. said:

The draft dodging mormon grifter vs the good doctor.

TH-TH-THERE'S STILL HOPE!
\

. said:

. said:

The draft dodging mormon grifter vs the good doctor.

TH-TH-THERE'S STILL HOPE!
\

. said:

There'd better be because the sh-t fest the jews are planning for us is going to hurt you more than me f-ggot.

Smell the reichsfrustration.