F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Work-Safe Bookmark and Share


Back to Index | Reply to Topic

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6  | Previous  Next | First  Last

  Typical CCW douchebag - See this 9mm pistol? This is my license to do what I want: Judge disagrees
..
Unregistered

. said:
.. said:You should probably study up on constitutional rights. You don't have the power to take them away son.

Suck on that.

:mittens:



The Constitution explicitly stated that this c-ntry is for we the people. Right wing fascist activist judges have ruled that the Constitution is invalid and this c-ntry is for We the Corporation. :insane: :lib:

I have studied the Constutution as I am a Constitution scholar :trev: and it always been the right wing that hates, rejects, rewrites, and sh-t on the Constitution

The Constitution clearly allows reasonable limitation on gun ownership. Mandating firearm trainings and tests is good for serious gun operators. I guess it would be very bad for losers that can't shoot and only use guns for masturbation and compensating their tiny penis erecting no longer than 10 seconds.



Tell it to the USSC Mr Constitution scholar :lmao: Last I checked they didn't mention 'firearm trainings and tests' anymore than they require literacy tests and poll taxes for voting.

Are you upset about that? Because if you are that's too f-cking bad. :lol:

:mittens:
.
Unregistered

. said:I would use a short barrel rifle for CBQ.



Like one you can't legally purchase in Kalifornia? :lol:
.
Unregistered

.. said:Tell it to the USSC Mr Constitution scholar :lmao: Last I checked they didn't mention 'firearm trainings and tests' anymore than they require literacy tests and poll taxes for voting.

Are you upset about that? Because if you are that's too f-cking bad. :lol:

:mittens:




Because firearm has potential to kill people, voting has no chance of killing people. The risk is higher, therefore the standard of care must be higher.

What I don't understand is why would the other side oppose to firearm trainings anyway? Don't you want to shoot faster, more accurate, and more effective?

Like I said, the other side is not interested in shooting, they just want to use gun to scare people.
.
Unregistered

. said:Like one you can't legally purchase in Kalifornia? :lol:



Not true. Cops can buy SBR.

I have no use for "close quarter combat"? You think you are Rambo or something?
..
Unregistered

. said:Not true. Cops can buy SBR.

I have no use for "close quarter combat"? You think you are Rambo or something?



So you live in an open field? Damn, you must have some really nice weather.
.
Unregistered

.. said:So you live in an open field? Damn, you must have some really nice weather.



I live in an flat in San Francisco. I have stated that I have no need for "close quarter combat". I do not pretend to be Rambo and stockpile weapons.
..
Unregistered

. said:Because firearm has potential to kill people, voting has no chance of killing people. The risk is higher, therefore the standard of care must be higher.

What I don't understand is why would the other side oppose to firearm trainings anyway? Don't you want to shoot faster, more accurate, and more effective?

Like I said, the other side is not interested in shooting, they just want to use gun to scare people.



Voting has killed MILLIONS. Your statement in bold is the dumbest thing I've ever read and that's saying A LOT on this board. :lol:

I'm not opposed to firearms training. I've taken plenty of it. Multiple courses a year for many years. It just shouldn't be mandatory to allow someone to exercise a basic constitutional right.
..
Unregistered

. said:I live in an flat in San Francisco. I have stated that I have no need for "close quarter combat". I do not pretend to be Rambo and stockpile weapons.



So you live in a nice open field? Or do you intend to just surrender your home if some breaks in?

Listening to your whiny acquiescence my guess is you would do exactly that. You'd be too :bluebunny: to do anything else.

Kill yourself. Just don't use a gun and add to the statistics.
.
Unregistered

.. said:Voting has killed MILLIONS. Your statement in bold is the dumbest thing I've ever read and that's saying A LOT on this board. :lol:

I'm not opposed to firearms training. I've taken plenty of it. Multiple courses a year for many years. It just shouldn't be mandatory to allow someone to exercise a basic constitutional right.



if owning firearm is so important to you, then you should spend time to study and pass the damn test. HSC is a f-cking joke. Losers that don't know how to shoot should learn how to shoot very well before owning one.

The Constitution clearly allows limitation on gun ownership. Such limitations have been ruled repeated valid on many cases.

Because Repukes started global war of terror, Americans have been less safe than ever. It is time to make American safer by demanding responsible gun ownership by a minimum of 40 hours training class annually
.
Unregistered

.. said:So you live in a nice open field? Or do you intend to just surrender your home if some breaks in?



On the other hand, you think a break-in automatically will result in a gun fight?

If you live in such a sh-tty area, you should move. If you think you can just shoot and kill anyone in a break-in, you will be arrested and be butt f-cked buy ni33a in prison.

But let's make no mistake about it, if a repuke breaks in my house, I will at a minimum waterboarding his ass.
.
Unregistered

. said:as a member of the NRA, I disagreed. We need to disarm buttholes from owning gun. This fread is a great example of an butthole that should never own any firearm to begin with. Laws are lacking in America to limit buttholes from owning gun.

I say ban all repukes, mentally retarded (evidence = watching Fauxnews), religious nutjobs of all sorts from owning any weapons.



:potd:
.
Unregistered

"I'm thinking ...this is an armed guy who has kidnapped a child. ...We're probably going to have to take a head shot to save the kid,"
.
Unregistered

AustralianCarFancier said:Show us a case of somebody with only an eighth of weed who get s more than 730 days.

And I mean only an eighth, no other crimes.



Oklahoma has some of the harshest weed laws you can imagine.
.
Unregistered

?
.
Unregistered

?
.
Unregistered

http://american-shemales.com/photos/shemale_nurse_bailey_jay.jpg
.
Unregistered

Actions have consequences. As a parent, that is probably a concept he should be teaching his child. Unfortunately he seems to think that he can just say "Sorry" and that will fix it all. Well, that's not the way it works in the real world. See, most of us know, without having to be told, that if we earn ourselves a criminal record, it will be harder to get work. That's why most people follow the law.
KM.as.a.dot
Unregistered

:finger:
KM.as.a.dot
Unregistered

http://anime-shemales.net/uploads/2010-10-29-569732/tn_6.jpg
KM.as.a.dot
Unregistered

:finger:
.
Unregistered

Where the f-ck do you get these pics???? Two-d-cked cartoon trannies :oldlol:
.
Unregistered

. said:This guy is a real f-cking winner.

http://www.thepotshot.com/2011/08/d-ck-of-month.html

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aLQ5mgDrQZw/TjiEwPr49JI/AAAAAAAAH_s/Yvi9GrslFAQ/s1600/Neustel%252C+Hugh+FB4.jpg

:tard:
more.seo
Unregistered

spun academy review
cpun academy testimonial
spun academy courses
spun academy brandon student s3x rumors
VP_Spiro_T_Cheney
Silicon Valley Insider

796 posts

. said:not typical you anti-gun rights f-ckhead



actually he is typical of the f-cktards who think they need to carry... a f-cking cowardly butthole and bully who wants a gun in order to push other people around
.
Unregistered

VP_Spiro_T_Cheney said:actually he is typical of the f-cktards who think they need to carry... a f-cking cowardly butthole and bully who wants a gun in order to push other people around

he prolly did that for a while until he p-ssed someone off to the point that the police was involved

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6  | Previous  Next | First  Last

Back to Index | Reply to Topic

 
Quick Reply
Moniker:
Message: